America has a stubborn tradition of banning books. The First Amendment may guarantee free speech, but we’ve never stopped trying to police it.
Lady Chatterley’s Lover and Ulysses were once blacklisted. More recently, schools have targeted Harry Potter, The Bluest Eye, The Handmaid’s Tale, The Kite Runner—and, with no sense of irony, 1984.
This isn’t new. Aristophanes’ 2,500 year-old comedy Lysistrata, in which women withhold sex to end war, was banned here from 1873 until 1954 under the Comstock laws. The crime? Mailing “lewd” material.
Easy to blame the Right. But the Left has been just as eager to censor.
In California, a liberal bastion, To Kill a Mockingbird was pulled from schools for its depiction of racism.
Progressives mirror conservative groups like Moms for Liberty. Campaigns such as We Need Diverse Books and Disrupt Texts demand the removal of classics: Huckleberry Finn for racial slurs, To Kill a Mockingbird _for “white savior themes,” Little House on the Prairie for its portrayal of Indigenous and Black people. Even Harry Potter is shunned—not for witchcraft this time, but for J.K. Rowling’s views on gender.
The real answer isn’t banning. It’s conversation.
Read the books. Put them in context. Argue about them. That’s how we confront uncomfortable truths—and maybe even learn something from them.
rj
Brimmings: up from the well 