Jane Goodall’s “Reason For Hope: A Spiritual Journey”

Finished reading Jane Goodall’s Reason For Hope: A Spiritual Journey, minutes ago, a compelling, yet difficult read, as Goodall bares not only triumphs, but personal tragedies in her long life.

Renowned for championing chimpanzees, our closest relative and, now, an endangered species, at 89 she travels widely, raising funds and informing audiences of the myriad challenges of entrenched poverty, species loss, and climate change. In 1950, 2 million chimpanzees roamed Africa’s then teeming wilderness. That’s dwindled to just 150,000 currently.

A compassionate woman who empathizes keenly with all who suffer, whether humans or animals, she’s not without hope that the human capacity for good as well as evil will ultimately triumph, saving not only mankind, but a beleagured Mother Earth. Above all, abides Jane’s vigorous faith in a greater Consciousness that pervades our universe and seeks our good.

Salient passages:

“But I have tried to write my story honestly—else why write the book at all?”

“It is probably the case that inappropriate or morally wrong behaviors are more often changed by the influence of outsiders, looking with different eyes, from different backgrounds.”

“In particular I became intensely aware of the being-ness of trees. The feel of rough sun-warmed bark of an ancient forest giant, or the cool, smooth skin of a young and eager sapling, gave me a strange, intuitive sense of the sap as it was sucked up by unseen roots and drawn up to the very tips of the branches, high overhead.”

“I saw chimps use and modify other objects as tools, such as crumpled leaves to sop rainwater from a hollow in a tree. Stones could be missiles; some of the males threw with good aim—as I sat there, keeping vigil, I thought, as I have thought so often since, what an amazing privilegeit was—to be utterly accepted thus by a wild, freeanimal. It is a privilege I shall never take for granted.”

“I found that my whole attitude to eating flesh abruptly changed. When I looked at a piece of meat on my plate I saw it as part of a once living creature, killed for me, and it seemed to symbolize fear, pain, and death—not exactly appetizing. So I stopped eating meat. For me, one of the delightful side effects of becoming a vegetarian was the change in my own health.”

“And people are beginning to suffer; in some places women must dig up the roots of trees long since cut down to get the firewood they need for cooking. And all this change is because the numbers of people have increased dramatically—mainly due to the explosive population growth, but also due to repeated influxes of refugees from troubled Burundi in the north, and more recently from eastern Congo. And this scenario is repeated again and again across the African continent and other developing countries: increased population growth, diminishing resources, and the destruction of nature, resulting in poverty and human suffering. Yes, we are destroying our planet. The forests are going, the soil is eroding, the water tables are drying, the deserts are increasing. There is famine, disease, poverty, and ignorance. There is human cruelty, greed, jealousy, vindictiveness, and corruption.“

“Each one of us matters, has a role to play, and makes a difference. Each one of us must take responsibility for our own lives, and above all, show respect and love for living things around us, especially each other. Together we must reestablish our connections with the natural world and with the Spiritual Power that is around us. And then we can move, triumphantly, joyously, into the final stage of human evolution—spiritual evolution.”

—rj

Why The Writers Guild of America Deserves Support

If you’ve been keeping-up with the Writers Guild of America strike, ongoing since May 2, 2023, you know it’s still a long ways from resolution. The Guild is seeking a fairer share of streaming residuals. They also want AI such as ChatGPT limited to research or facilitating ideas and not as a means to replacing them.

But just how big a threat does AI pose for WGA writers? Many members think AI has its limitations but, nonetheless, could make inroads on some of their tasks.

While AI may pose a greater threat longterm as it progresses in sophistication (Paul McCartney reports he recently used AI to compose his latest song), I view AI as assisting, not replacing writers. It simply can’t replace the subtleties of the human mind, or what I like to call emotive intelligence.

New technologies like AI, however, do require adaptation, those using it replacing writers who don’t. It’s like calculators. They abound, but so do mathematicians. Fields requiring deep, often intuitive, knowledge, like psychology, sociology, etc, and most fields of medicine, will remain valid. I seriously doubt AI will replace engineers, or for that matter, your local plumber.

But back to the WGA. They deserve fair payment for what they do, providing the texts without which TV, movie, and theater couldn’t exist. Residuals are already paid to actors and, of course, the streaming moguls reap the far greater share of remuneration.

I’ve always felt that writers, in general, suffer a dismal fate when it comes to earnings. We hear about the 2% who make it to the highest tier. The vast majority of writers don’t give-up their day jobs.

Did you know that the average annual earnings by a New Yorker staff writer is a mere $54,000 annually?

I admire empathetic actors like Vincent D’Onofrio who see the unfairness and are lending their full support to WGA members.

–rj