I hadn’t realized until recently just how much politics has intruded into medical funding. And I’m not writing about the controversial “Obamacare,” recently validated by the Supreme Court and set to go into full implementation in 2014. This intrusion has its genesis through several administrations, going all the way back to the early 80s. Consider that current government bio-medical allocations by the National Institutes of Health include the following 2012 funding:
Lately, I’ve taken a strong interest in….
When it comes to stress….
1. You’re driving through a residential neighborhood. There are stop signs at the end of each block. You’re behind this guy who doesn’t stop at any of them. The speed limit, well- posted, says 25. He’s going at least 40. It gets to you: why is it some people think the law’s for other people?
2. You thought you had a connection with someone, only to learn they’ve been putting you through a shedder when talking to others.
i was reading somewhere….
I was recently reading….
I was recently reading a favorite minimalist blog. You know, the kind that stresses simplifying one’s life, something I wrote about recently. The blogger writes about her teaming up with another blogger to reduce her sugar intake, not a bad idea, considering the increasing occurrence of obesity and diabetes, even in children.
She mentions that she eats an apple a day as her primary sugar intake. If I remember things right, your sugar intake shouldn’t exceed 36 grams daily. An apple, at 25 grams, almost gets you there. A medium banana nets you 14 grams.
This leads to a conundrum for me, to say the least. After all, most medical sources recommend five daily servings of fruit, which help assure proper fiber intake and promote digestive health. Assuming fruit is loaded with sugar, five helpings would suggest you’d be way over the max.
Out of curiosity, I checked the National Diabetes Association site and found they include fruit as a sugar source. While they encourage you to eat fruit, you have to trade off with your carb intake. Rather cumbersome, I’d say. By the way, I wasn’t aware before of how carbohydrates contribute to your blood glucose. Cutting out sugar isn’t as easy as it might appear. Seems you almost need to be a chemist. Just looking at the sugar content on a label doesn’t suffice.
On the other hand, there are the well-respected holistic doctors such as Neil Barnard and Joel Fuhrman, who shun limits on intake of fresh fruits, though not fruit drinks. For them, the key is avoiding processed, or refined, foods. This includes refined carbohydrates. What about unrefined carbs such as brown rice? These are the good guys, the complex carbs, which haven’t had their fiber stripped away.
Who’s right? I side with Fuhrman and Barnard. Don’t stress about carbs or fruit, unless you’re diabetic. Focus on fruits, plant foods, and the good carbs like oatmeal, rye, multigrain and sourdough breads, brown rice, pasta, etc.
You can also select more wisely by using a glycemic index chart, available online. The GI indicates how quickly the food item converts to blood sugar. White potatoes, for example, have a high GI. Try a sweet potato instead. Back to the complex carbs. In general, they have lower GIs.
I’ve found medicine isn’t an exact science. Abounding in contradiction and uninformed, even dangerous, practices, you always have to be wary. When it comes to sugar, say no to its common sources– table sugar, cakes, pastries, sodas, etc. But then don’t forget the carbs and fruit. Check their GI. Avocados, for example, have a very low GI.
We are what we eat. Better: We become what we eat. Did you know that 60 percent of our diseases come from what we eat?
Anybody for an apple?
One of my favorite things to do online is ….
Worrying as personal nemesis
Stress as a health menace
Father’s Day again
rj
Ephemeral–now that’s a mouthful….
Ephemeral–now that’s a mouthful for a word infrequently used, and meaning short-lived. Still, it’s one of the most vitalizing words in the English language. That is, if we can grasp its implications–that ending hovers over everything, over what and whom we love.
Mortality lies at the groundswell of poetry, that time erodes and even memory dulls, that it brings with it alteration. Its waves, often unperceived in the languorous satiety of life, nonetheless sweep in and out, cast up, then take away. Life has its rhythms. There is a time to be born and a time to die, as Ecclesiastes tells us.
I contemplate not upon human mortality only, but upon best friendships, happy events, kind deeds, promises made, hopes gathered of good health, material comfort, my children’s happiness. I know now that even the mountains grow and die.
As a college student, I once wrote a poem about a tree outside my class window–its pregnant fullness, its long life with more to come, the irony that a tree like some Galapagos sea turtle should outlive humans, evolution’s crowning achievement. Several months later, the bulldozers moved in.
Again, I think of so many poems I have loved, poignant in their melancholy of demise and ending: Shakespeare’s “Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?”; Yeats’s “The Wild Swans Of Coole”; Dylan Thomas’s “Fern Hill”; Houseman’s “Loveliest of Trees, the Cherry Now”; my favorite, Keats’ “Ode to a Nightingale”.
At times I have felt like the Psalmist who wrote of weeping by the waters of Babylon in recall of Zion’s pre-Captivity halcyon past. Like him, I know that even nations rise and fall.
I know, too, that time fades the sensory past and often bequeaths a future not granting great expectations.
Yet I do not mourn life’s ephemerality, for I have learned to revere what I cannot keep, to indulge each new day, to love more fully.
With much that’s taken, much is given.
We have only the Now in which to seek and find the Grail.
rj


