Zarkaria’s GPS: must viewing


I always enjoy tuning into Fareed Zakaria’s GPS. Zakaria, who also writes for the Washington Post and Time, strikes me as a man largely free of assumptions, or political bias. Last week, for example, he provided helpful explanation of Mitt Romney’s all over the map positions, motivating Republicans, whether liberal or conservative, to be wary. Romney’s shifts lie behind retired general and former Bush secretary of state Colin Powell’s endorsement on Thursday of Obama for reelection.

Zakaria offers that Romney’s protean shifts are due to Tea Party elements within the Republican Party. It’s stratagem entirely, though one could argue this reenforces the widely-held notion Romney’s deceitful. According to Zakaria, Romney’s surge in the polls is due to his moving over to more moderate positions on key issues. In short, this is the real Romney who can now return to the middle that characterized his tenure as Massachusetts’s governor. After all, Obamacare is modeled after Romney’s historic health insurance legislation in Massachusetts. While it doesn’t get Romney off the hook, it’s analysis like this that can provide another purview.

I also enjoy the broad spectrum of GPS‘ panel feature with its participants drawn from neo-con to far left. Again, cool-headed analysis to extract the factual and reasonable governs Zakaria’s show.

One of my favorite, can’t wait show elements comes at very end when Zakaris gives his weekly book recommendation. I’ve actually taken him up on several of his recommended reads such as Charles Murphy’s Coming Apart: the State of White America, 1960-2010, a book by the way that supports Romney’s off-the-cuff notion of the 47% who pay no taxes and not necessarily from need. I intend to pursue this week’s recommendation of Nate Silver’s The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail–but Some Don’t.

For me, Zakaria provides a refreshing change from the pervasive mortar shelling of the current political scene, whether at MSNBC or Fox News, or among the partisans of the print media and social networks at large. After all, I like finding the truth for myself as best we humans can get at it to someone’s imposing her notion of the truth on me.

You can dismiss me as quixotic, but I find the probing almost as much fun as the finding.

Thank you, Fareed!

Be well,

rj

Twitter’s wrong move

Twitter today did the unprecedented. It shut down a neo-Nazi site, @hannoverticker, though only in Germany at the request of the German government. Earlier in the year Twitter announced it would close down sites in conflict with local law while leaving them open internationally. I wonder if this policy is really nothing more than appeasement of religious conservatives in Islamic counties such as Iran or Pakistan. Whatever, today they exercised that option for the first time. We”ll have to see where this thing ultimately goes. Despotic governments will probably become even more adamant in demanding the same be done for them when they find their power threatened.

Think about it: Twitter has proven a catalyst for change in such countries, a jungle drums scenario that dispenses what ideologues would snuff out, the yearning of the oppressed to undo their shackles. It’s inconceivable to think of an Arab spring without the social media’s advocacy; the phenomenon of the Occupy Wall Street Movement that spread to other countries; the daily revelations of otherwise sequestered Syrian government atrocities against its own people.

Twitter, what you’ve done is a grievous wrong. I can’t really speak for your motives, but the end doesn’t justify the means.

In Turkey, world-renowned pianist Faxil Say’s trial has begun. He’s been arrested for alleged defamation of the prophet Mohammed. Ironically, the charges stem from several of his tweets. “I am not sure if you realize it, but if there is a louse, a non-entity, a lowlife, a thief or fool, it’s always an Islamist.” So much for Turkey’s aspirations to join the European Union. Ataturk, the father of modern Turkey, must be turning over in his grave.

In our own land, the threat to harness our right to free speech remains under continuous attack in the current reign of political correctness and the narrow confines of political and religious ideologues bent on imposing their own views, not through better arguments, but by shutting now those who oppose them. This afternoon, In Ocala, Florida, as Republican veep nominee Paul Ryan gave a campaign speech, malingers gathered nearby, bent on disrupting the rally.

Back to Twitter. Why not protect the speech rights of tweeters like prominent African-American actress, Stacey Dash (“Clueless”), who recently urged her 200,000 followers to vote for Romney. Almost immediately, scores of threats on her life. Hey, Twitter, these are the people you need to use your broom on.

Censorship has its place against those who sanction violence, or like those just mentioned. Otherwise, as I’ve said, fight a bad idea with a better one.

John Stuart Mill was spot on when in he wrote in On Liberty, that “if all mankind minus one were of one opinion, and only one person were of the contrary opinion, mankind would be no more justified in silencing that one person than he, if he had the power, would be justified in silencing mankind.

I suspect the roots of Twitter’s action is money. Nicholas Kulish, writing in the New York Times, takes us back to last summer’s Olympics when Twitter blocked the account of a British journalist who heavily criticized NBC’s reporting of the Games. (NBC is one of Twitter’s corporate sponsors.) Twitter later apologized and reinstated the account.

Twitter may have opened up a Pandora’s box for itself. So far, six governments have made requests for site closures.

Be well,

rj

Wake-up call for Pakistan?

“I had a terrible dream yesterday with military helicopters and the Taliban. I have had such dreams since the launch of the military operation in Swat. I was afraid [of] going to school because the Taliban had issued an edict banning all girls from attending schools. Only 11 students attended the class out of 27. The number decreased because of Taliban’s edict. On my way from school to home I heard a man saying ‘I will kill you’. I hastened my pace… to my utter relief he was talking on his mobile and must have been threatening someone else over the phone.” (Malawa Yousufzai’s blog, 3 October 2009)

Finally, it seems volatile Pakistan is united by a heinous Taliban act, the October 9th shooting of 14-year old schoolgirl, Malala Yousufzai, along with two of her school mates. Malala’s offense? Her brave, public criticisms of Taliban restrictions on girls’ having access to education. Calls for more aggressive action against Taliban insurgents in Pakistan are now widespread, embracing even conservative Muslim factions.

Up to now, little has been done against the Taliban, who have concentrated their presence in remote northwestern Pakistan, including the Swat Valley where Malala lives. As I write, Malala appears to be making a slow recovery after a bullet pierced her neck and traveled to her spine. While she’s now able to move her hands and legs, following a reduction in sedatives, her prognosis for full recovery remains uncertain.

In a horrid compromise, Islamabad in 2007 agreed to the Talban occupation. After taking-over the Valley, the Taliban forced men to wear beards, blew up schools, many of them for girls, and forbade women access to the market place.

Pakistan’s army entered the valley in 2009 following these outrages, causing Taliban leaders to flee into Afghanistan. Nevertheless, the Taliban remain a formidable presence.

Malala’s ordeal isn’t an isolated incident. It’s happened in multiples, both in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Not long ago, it made headlines when Taliban gassed a school for girls in Afghanistan. In Pakistan, they recently beat-up a girl who wanted to go to school.

It saddens me that in the recent Biden-Ryan debate Malala’s horrid fate never received mention, even when our Afghanistan policy entered into the debate and a woman reporter served as moderator. The unrepentant Taliban leadership meanwhile promises they’ll try again, should Malala survive.

Surely such silence bodes ill for women in Afghanistan when coalition forces leave Afghanistan in 2014. Unless Islamabad opts for a decisive policy change towards its insurgent presence, the duress of women seeking self-realization through the liberation education provides is likely to continue. Up to now, Pakistan has sent mixed signals, more concerned with negating Indian influence in Afghanistan via destabilization than negotiated reconciliation with its neighbor that would also ameliorate life for many of Pakistan’s own beleaguered women.

While presently Pakistan’s military and political elite beat a path to her bedside, it’s probable they’ll re-clothe themselves in silence, unless Pakistanis continue to speak out.

One final thought: What’s happened to Malala again reveals the horrid calumny of doctrinaire ideology, whether religious or political, when polemic turns into hate and spills over into intolerance.

rj

Getting the monkey off your back

Take a moment, in a quiet spot, and close your eyes. Visualize a scene from the past that gave you a sense of peace or relief from daily anxiety. For me, it’s hiking the trail up lofty Ben Nevis in Scotland with my wife several years ago. I can still see the narrow trail’s steep ascent, slate gray limestone fences dividing a retreating green tapestry below, snow-flaked with sheep; hear a babbling brook; feel the day’s exhilarating coolness. I find again the shepherd psalmist’s quiet waters and renewal.

Such moments are rarer now for many of us, given the frenetic pace of modern life with its myriad stresses. The poet Auden knew this when he famously dubbed our era “the age of anxiety.” We pop our pills, vegetate before our TVs, seeking relief from deadlines to meet or places to go.

It isn’t really cancer, heart disease or the like that are killing us. It’s stress, and much of our morbidity is its result. We eat more, worry more, hurry more. Twenty percent of us suffer from acute anxiety disorder requiring professional intervention, while our media proclaims daily the social violence of those who “just can’t take it anymore.”

Here are some suggestions that have helped me and may help you ease up and enjoy your life more fully, ways of coping that may even help you live longer:

1. Change your reactions: A lot of our stress derives not from what happens, but how we respond. We can choose to adapt like that Robert Frost birch bending with the wind, rather than arching its boughs, or remain brittle like a Bradford pear, its limbs severed by the storm. Substitute a positive alternative for a negative one. What we think fosters our emotions, and emotions often generate our distress. Instead of dwelling on how awful the economy is, think of how it’s likely to ultimately get better. It’s not “that sob, he cut me off”! Instead, drivers can be rude, but most aren’t. It’s not, “What’s going to happen?, but “Let’s take it just one day at a time.

2. Get a hobby: Like birds, learn to identify them. Fond of the outdoors, join a hiking group. Enjoy games? Try contact bridge. Cooking? Attempt new recipes. Want something new? How about learning another language?

3. Take-up meditation: Clearing the mind’s clutter goes back several thousand years.
It endures because it works. Don’t know how? Check your local resources. They’re abundant now. Stress reduces the brain’s white matter (the wired area of the consisting largely of nerve fibers). The good news is that according to a published report in the Proceedings of the National Academy, just 30 minutes of meditation over a two week period showed measurable changes in the white matter, indicating that meditation facilitates healthy brain function.

4. Try biofeedback: Many find the device Resperate useful for teaching them precise breath control that produces a relaxation effect. Dividend, it reduces blood pressure. Resperate gets a thumbs up from a number of leading medical resources, including Mayo Clinic.

5. Say no! You’ve only so much time in a day. Take time for yourself. Give yourself a special treat each week. Go for that dessert! See that movie! If you can, set one day aside for yourself.

6. Read! This means shutting off that TV. Television, mostly a mind-numbing activity, doesn’t generally relieve our stress. It may even add to it. Reading expands the mind and relaxes at the same time. At bedtime, it can help you get a good night’s sleep.

7. Blog! I can speak first hand about what it does for me. When I’m writing, it seems I’ve hurled my anxieties into the deepest sea. Writing not only opens a window on the world, it brings me into touch with myself, clarifies and cleanses, while providing perspective.

8. Drink green tea:. It works because of its i-theanine content, which you can also find in pill supplements at your local health stores or at Whole Foods. Drink it several times daily, especially when you feel uptight. Taking about 30-minutes to kick-in, it’s super just before bedtime and will help you sleep like a rock.

8. Exercise: Nothing really new about this life essential, along with good nutrition, for promoting health. But exercise also relieves stress. The trick is to schedule it into your day. The preferred form should be aerobic, and the cardinal rule remains 5-days a week, 30 minutes minimal.

9. Tablets: I ‘m not thinking pills here, but of those popular devices such as the iPad. I’ve become fond of the mind-stretching game apps in particular like Sudoku. Talk about time out, diversion comes easily with a tablet. It doesn’t have to be confined to games. Tablets provide apps for virtually any interest. How far away troubles seem when you find a riveting app.

10. Turn on the music! Shakespeare rightly said, “Music hath charms to soothe the savage beast.” Obviously, it works, or it wouldn’t be so popular. To promote relaxation, however, stay away from the frenzied kind. I like classical Indian music for this purpose. You might also find Enya very soothing. She works for me. Sometimes I just go for the sounds of nature: waves washing up on the shore, a murmuring brook, birds in early morning revelry, the soft pitter-patter of falling rain, etc.

Yes, you can get that monkey, stress, off your back, and in doing so, wake with joy each morning, eager to seize the day.

Be well,

rj

Worrying as personal nemesis

I don’t know about you, but I worry a lot, even about little things, and I’ve been this way my whole life.  Maybe it’s in the genes.  Now and then, I get these vivid flashbacks of my dad, a chronic worrier, ensconced in his armchair, peering out the window for long stretches, chin resting on his hand, like Rodin’s Thinker.
Believe me!  I’m trying like the dickens to get free from its weight and adopt a more casual, perhaps fatalistic view of the way life works in a world often mediated by chance, not will, human or divine.  
Worrying displays my need to control, a rather arrogant pose if you think about it–as if any of us possess the key unlocking our hoard chest of desires.
It’s a hard thing to quit once you’re into it, which is odd, since worry has so little to recommend it, except to delude us into thinking we can keep destiny’s jackals at bay.
This isn’t to say we shouldn’t prepare for tomorrow, say like getting an insurance policy or making a will.  In life’s lottery, diligence has often proved our evolutionary savior.  Take the Dutch building their dykes, for example.
Oddly, it’s the intelligent person who often gets himself caught on barbwire speculation.
In fact, worry may very well characterize intelligence.  In the February 1, 2012  Frontiers in Evolutionary Science, we learn of a research study involving 26 people with generalized  anxiety disorder and 18 healthy people without this disorder. Intelligence tests and brain activity scans showed anxiety and high intelligence were linked.
As I hinted earlier, worrying may have conferred survivability.
Then, should I continue to indulge my vice?
Think of it like salt and pepper: a little bit won’t hurt, but no more than a pinch or you’ll spoil the broth!

Father’s Day again

Here we are again at Father’s Day.  Tell you the truth, I don’t think about it all that much now.  My father passed away in 1977.  My wife put the whole thing succinctly last night. Sparked by one of those many Father’s Day TV commercials, she lamented on no longer having a father to send a card to this year.  We lost Dad just this past February, a gentle, good man with simple tastes and abundant kindness.  I miss him, too.
Losing parents are markers of our own journey in life’s rhythms such as finishing school, getting our first job, falling in love, and becoming parents in turn.  When we lose our parents we find ourselves advanced to taking the point position.  Now that can be pretty sobering.
I can’t send a card anymore to my own Dad, make a call, or do a visit.  After some thirty-five years, do I ever think about my father?  Might as well forget there’s a sunrise, I think of him so often.
Pa, as we called him, was uneven as a performing father.  He had excess appetites, particularly for alcohol.  He could be crude and sometimes violent, not just when he boozed. He treated Ma badly and drove her from us.  He was very Irish in the wrong way.
And yet I can honestly say I owe him considerable debts.  I know no one who’s influenced me more.  We don’t get to choose our parents, and some are blessed with drawing the best hand.  I had to play with the hand I was dealt.
Pa taught me to be discerning when it came to people.  Though poorly educated, not uncommon for workers born before 1900, he could read the con and cross the street in time.  
I became a news buff like him.  Each day, there he was, in his leather chair in the kitchen, by the window, bent over the Philly paper, often reading portions to me.  On Sunday mornings, he’d send me up the street to get the massive paper, a feast for both of us, as he’d give me one portion while he read another.  There I was, a ten year old boy, sprawled on the living room floor, reading the latest about the Korean War.  It almost seemed I knew Harry Truman personally.
Pa didn’t like you wearing a hat at the supper table.  He found it rude to wear a cap in the house, period.  There was this one time my brother didn’t respond to his request to take off his hat at the supper table.  Pa never asked twice.  Suddenly his hand struck.  To this day I have an aversion to people wearing hats while eating.  Today he’d be aghast at how common it is, whether in restaurants or classrooms.  Pa was spared seeing men not removing their caps at the ball park while the National Anthem is played.
He taught through example the virtue of working hard. I know of no man who worked harder.  On occasion, I’d visit him at the leather factory just around he corner,  You could smell its toxins on those unrelieved humid summer nights in Philly, not a breeze between the Schuylkill and the Delaware.  He worked on the third floor, tacking skins to boards, nails held between his lips, several of his fingers of his nailing hand permanently positioned from long years of tacking, a family tradition for us in those days when America made its own shoes.  Fiercely independent, he eschewed welfare.  
Pa was an obsessive letter writer and in the ensuing years when life found his four children scattered across the landscape, he unceasingly wrote all of us, urging us to stay connected, and we did and still do.  Like him, in those days when email, messaging, cell phones and Skype were unknowns, we became letter writers in turn.
One of my best memories of Pa was his love for baseball.  We didn’t have a TV in those days, so while I played with my toy trucks on the floor, I’d be imbibing radio broadcasts of the Philly and Athletic games. A New Englander, his real passion was the Red Sox, an addiction he passed on to me, adding to life’s groans.  Mornings saw me playing stick ball against factory walls, into the hours, with my fellow Fishtown rogues.
Like a good many Irish, he excelled in story telling.  How often into the night, no matter the retellings, I listened entranced to stories of his own parents or of the World War I battlefield, or of his run for political office, or of his work struggles during the Great Depression, or of his replay on getting the Pearl Harbor news that terrible Sunday morning, and best, those anecdotes of the family tribe, of aunts and uncles and countless cousins, of rumored Indian origins.  Fact or fiction?  Who the hell cared.  The embroidery was wonderful!
Pa was a grab-bag of good and bad.  There was the drinking and its legacy for bad memories.  But then he was also a victim of a hand-me-down culture, or as James Joyce memorably put it, “Ireland sober is Ireland free,” a witticism that liberally applies to its Diaspora.
I think it was Nietzsche who said that if one didn’t have a good father, it was necessary to create one. I don’t think that’s what I’m doing here.  I see it more from the reality of acknowledging the human condition, or as Anais Nin said so well, as always, “The human father has to be confronted and recognized as human.”
Whatever Pa’s faults, good things fell from his table, and in reconciling the books, I’ve found the assets outweigh the liabilities, and for this I remain a grateful son, his bucko still.


rj
  

Ephemeral–now that’s a mouthful….

Ephemeral–now that’s a mouthful for a word infrequently used, and meaning short-lived. Still, it’s one of the most vitalizing words in the English language. That is, if we can grasp its implications–that ending hovers over everything, over what and whom we love.

Mortality lies at the groundswell of poetry, that time erodes and even memory dulls, that it brings with it alteration. Its waves, often unperceived in the languorous satiety of life, nonetheless sweep in and out, cast up, then take away. Life has its rhythms. There is a time to be born and a time to die, as Ecclesiastes tells us.

I contemplate not upon human mortality only, but upon best friendships, happy events, kind deeds, promises made, hopes gathered of good health, material comfort, my children’s happiness. I know now that even the mountains grow and die.

As a college student, I once wrote a poem about a tree outside my class window–its pregnant fullness, its long life with more to come, the irony that a tree like some Galapagos sea turtle should outlive humans, evolution’s crowning achievement. Several months later, the bulldozers moved in.

Again, I think of so many poems I have loved, poignant in their melancholy of demise and ending: Shakespeare’s “Shall I Compare Thee to a Summer’s Day?”; Yeats’s “The Wild Swans Of Coole”; Dylan Thomas’s “Fern Hill”; Houseman’s “Loveliest of Trees, the Cherry Now”; my favorite, Keats’ “Ode to a Nightingale”.

At times I have felt like the Psalmist who wrote of weeping by the waters of Babylon in recall of Zion’s pre-Captivity halcyon past. Like him, I know that even nations rise and fall.

I know, too, that time fades the sensory past and often bequeaths a future not granting great expectations.

Yet I do not mourn life’s ephemerality, for I have learned to revere what I cannot keep, to indulge each new day, to love more fully.

With much that’s taken, much is given.

We have only the Now in which to seek and find the Grail.

rj

Lately I’ve been reading….

Lately I’ve been reading F. Scott Fitzgerald’s lesser known novel, This Side of Paradise. It’s one of those freebies you can now download, given its removal from copyright after fifty years.

This novel focuses on the character Amory Blaine. There’s not much to like about Amory, particularly his conceit. He interests me because he resembles many of us. He likes control. He has a zeal to be noticed. He’s self conscious in everything he does. He must be perfect. He must be liked. In his self-absorption, he’s quick to take offense.

In the course of things, he meets his third cousin, Clara Page, with whom he falls in love. Widowed and impoverished, she nonetheless has a compelling resilience about her and an insightful way of getting to the core of things. As her first name suggests, she functions as a clarifier in her intuitive keenness. She sees, for example, the source of Amory’s vanity and sensitivity to criticism.

Clara is direct in her dissection of Amory’s egotism as a mask for deeply seated feelings of personal inadequacy:

“You sink to the third hell of depression when you think you’ve been slighted. In fact, you haven’t much self-respect.”

Here, as elsewhere in this novel, Fitzgerald proves a keen observer of the psychological motives behind outward behavior.

When we wound easily or strive overly it often stems from a sense we don’t measure up. Perfectionists, we yearn for approval as evidence of our self-worth. Over achievers, we require validation.

Clara again hits the nail on the head, exclaiming, “The reason you have so little self-confidence, even though you gravely announce to the occasional philistine that you’re a genius, is that you’ve attributed all sorts of faults to yourself and are trying to live up to them.”

Amory suffers from a common anxiety malaise that can shackle our potential for finding happiness. It becomes difficult to elude its hydra tentacles, as it requires an honest and painful, acknowledgment of our weaknesses. But it’s the only way out. Until we can live with ourselves, warts and all, we can’t really find contentment.

This doesn’t mean getting into self-flagellation. It isn’t wallowing we’re after. It’s self-acceptance. Only then can true healing begin. We become lovable when we learn to love ourselves. Forgiving ourselves, we can forgive others.

Mitch Albom got it right in his The Five People You Meet in Heaven: “‘You have peace, the old woman said, ‘when you make peace with yourself.'”

rj

If you had but one wish

If you had but one wish that could change your life, what would it be? Would it come down to the traditional game-players as primary motivators: wealth, power, fame? There are some, however few, the angels among us, who’d choose helping others. Still others, and they number in the millions actually, who’d opt for living a life pleasing to God.

Frankly, this is a hard question for me to answer, for I can think of still other pleasing options like enjoying good health, freedom from anxiety, the respect of others, etc. What other options could you add to this list? Perhaps a happy marriage and family life, or to be loved, or to have a best friend, or even just to be appreciated? Now remember, you only get one wish. In a showdown, which is it for you? And why? See, it isn’t all that easy. Like so much in life, making one decision often means forfeiting another. For me, it’s a whole lot easier to choose between good and bad than between two kinds of good.

Of course you might conjecture that these choices are always personal, since their consequences may make some happy, others less so. I use “happy” deliberately, for isn’t this implied for ourselves in any wish we’d like to come true?

Me, I’ve long been suspicious of the underlying premise of E. A. Robinson’s “Richard Cory” many of us have read in high school English. You know–the guy everybody envied for his wealth, only to kill himself. Sorry to any of you preferring orthodoxy, but I think I like the money wish best, not for its own sake, or from greed, but because it actually multiplies my choices: I can find the best doctors; provide better for those I love, animals as well as people; help preserve Nature’s diminishing footprint; endow cancer charities and provide food for the hungry; choose where I want to live; come upon better, more quality goods.

Not to be left out, I’d gain access to people I’d like to be with–accomplished, refined, intelligent, connoisseurs of excellence. In my social station, I don’t see much of this. It hangs out in certain zip codes replete with people who choose where to live for its amenities like good schools, safe neighborhoods where you don’t have to watch your back, tranquil parks, tree-lined streets, a neighborhood club house, tennis courts and pool, maybe even an equine barn for stabling your horse or say an adjacent golf course; but best of all, neighbors who share a respect for education, intelligence, liberal thought, and professional accomplishment. I see them at symphonies, I read of their charity, note their activism for making life fairer for the marginalized, their absence of malice or rancor toward those of different color or ethnicity or sexual persuasion, their freedom from extremism, whether political or religious. They assume leadership roles in their community. They fund the arts. They work for quality schools. They are not isotopes couched before TV screens. In the politics of opportunism they are often the scapegoats for what ails, when the reality is they pay most of the taxes, despite what you hear, and frequently do more to provide enterprise, meaning jobs for you and me.

No E. A. Robinson for me. I prefer F. Scott Fitzgerald, who envied the rich in their gated life as an obsessed outsider desiring entrance. And I know why.

Where are you, Aladdin with your magical lamp? I’ve a wish to make.

rj

I am back!

I am back!

I am back! This after several months of illness. And I’m feeling better.

I appreciate those of you who read my blog worldwide: Russia, UK, Canada, Germany, the USA, Japan. I’ve missed you!

For new readers, this is an indie blog. I write my observations on a wide variety of topics to provide a stimulus for thought and discussion. I craft carefully with you in mind, usually two or three times a week. You are invited to respond, either through the response option or email options that follow each entry. Don’t be shy and always be gentle with me and each other. Please forgive my sometimes exuberance. I’ve always been a Romantic at heart.

rj